JUROR DECISIONS IN A RAPE TRIAL INVOLVING AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER

Abstract

Juror decision-making in rape trials is a complex cognitive and social process influenced by evidentiary factors, legal instructions, personal beliefs, and implicit biases. When a complainant, defendant, or key witness has Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), these dynamics become even more intricate. Autism-related traits such as atypical communication, limited eye contact, flat affect, sensory sensitivity, and differences in social understanding may be misinterpreted by jurors as indicators of deception, unreliability, or lack of credibility. This research article examines how autism spectrum disorder affects juror perceptions and verdicts in rape trials. Drawing on psychological theory, empirical mock-juror studies, and forensic practice, the paper analyzes common misconceptions, cognitive heuristics, and bias mechanisms that shape juror reasoning. It further explores legal safeguards, expert testimony, and remedial strategies aimed at improving fairness and accuracy in jury decision-making. The article advocates for autism-informed judicial processes to ensure that justice is not compromised by neurodiversity-related misunderstanding.